Publication Details
At the origin of the Formalist Metaphysics of distinctions: the theological purpose of introduction of distinctio formalis in the work of John Duns Scotus, OFM | |
Title in the language of publication: | У истоков формалистской метафизики дистинкций: теологические цели введения формальной дистинкции в трудах Иоанна Дунса Скота, ОМБ. Предисловие к публикации |
Author: |
Vitaliy Ivanov
Research Fellow at the Research and Education Center for Religion, Philosophy, and Culture Studies at St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation.
Address: 67A Bolshaya Morskaia str., Saint-Petersburg, 190000, Russia.
E-mail: ivavit@gmail.com
|
Issue: |
P. 185–204.
|
Language: | Russian |
Document type: | Research Article (introdaction) |
Acknowledgments: | The present study is a part of the project № 16-03-00047, “The followers of John Duns Scotus in the XIVth–XVIth centuries Scholasticism: Problems of Epistemology and Metaphysics”, implemented with a financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. |
Abstract
This article is an analytical and historiographical introduction to the publication of a Russian translation of the texts by the Franciscan theologian and metaphysician John Duns Scotus, dedicated to the concept of formal distinction or formal non-identity. The article shows that discussion of trinitarian problems took the most important place in the Scholastic theology of the High Scholasticism, and demonstrates that the main motive and purpose of introducing the concept of “formal distinction” by Duns Scotus and of the development of the doctrine of distinctions in general was an attempt to resolve the “great difficulty” of Trinitarian theology that reads, in Scotus’s formulation: how is it possible that in one really identical Person in the Trinity, insofar as it is identical with the communicated divine essence, inhere a predicate of communicability, and at once, insofar as it is an uncommunicated (to the other Persons) suppositum, i. e. since it is constituted by its own personal property (fatherhood, sonship, etc.), inhere a predicate of incommunicability, i.e. the contradictory predicates? It seems that this violates the first principle of any (including theological) knowledge. According to Scotus, only the assumption of a distinction between a personal property and an essence in a divine Person is capable of providing a possibility of a consistent understanding of the main article of Christian doctrine — the compatibility of the unity and indivisibility of the divine essence and of the multitude of three Persons really different from each other. Moreover Scotus insists that this distinction should be inherent in the Person “ex natura rei”, i. e. not only be the product of an act of human or even divine intellectus. Further, the article shows the importance of Scotus’s formal distinction for the subsequent scholastic theology: a fierce discussion about this concept and its applicability in theology both in the ranks of Scotus’s opponents and among his followers has led to the outcome that the theme of distinctions and identities has become one of the most important in scholastic theology, metaphysics and epistemology. In addition, we single out and characterize the four main argumentative and thematic contexts of Scotus’s use of the concept of “formal distinction” in his works: trinitarian, the context of attribute theology, the constitution of the finite being, and the general metaphysical context. Finally, the article describes the main discussion in the modern studies of Scotus’s doctrine of formal distinction — concerning the degree of reality inherent to the formal distinction, and also gives short assessment regarding the main topic of this discussion and validity of the positions taken by its main participants.
Keywords
Trinitarian theology, High Scholasticism, Duns Scotus, the doctrine of formal distinction, discussion concerning the “realism” of Scotus.
References
Primary source editions
Anselmus Cantuariensis (1863) “De Divinitatis Essentia Monologium”. Patrologia cursus completus. Series Latina (ed. J.-P. Migne). T. 158. Parisiis: Excudebatur et venit apud J.-P. Migne editorem: 141–224.
Aristoteles (1552) Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois commentariis. Vol. I. Aristotelis Stagiritae organum, quod logicam appelant, cum Averrois Cordubensis variis commentariis, epitome, quaesitis, ac epistola una. Hic accesserunt Levi Ghersonides in nonnullos Aristotelis et Averrois libros annotationes… et quorundam Arabum quaesita et epistola. Venetiis: Apud Junctas (Editio Juntina prima).
Aristoteles (1562) Aristotelis Opera cum Averrois commentariis. Vol. VIII. Aristotelis Metaphysicorum libri XIIII cum Averrois Cordubensis in eosdem commentariis et epitome, Theophrasti metaphysicorum liber. Venetiis: Apud Junctas (Editio Juntina secunda).
Aristoteles (1831) Aristotelis opera. Vol. 1–2. Aristoteles Graece (ed. Imm. Bekker). Ed. Academia Regia Borussica. Berolini: Apud Georgium Reimerum.
Aurelius Augustinus (1864) “De Civitate Dei libri XXII”. Patrologia cursus completus. Series Latina (ed. J.-P. Migne). T. 41. Parisiis: Excudebatur et venit apud J.-P. Migne editorem: 13–804.
Aurelius Augustinus (1865a) “De diversis Quaestionibus octoginta tribus liber unus”. Patrologia cursus completus. Series Latina (ed. J.-P. Migne). T. 40. Parisiis: Excudebatur et venit apud J.-P. Migne editorem: 11–100.
Aurelius Augustinus (1865b) “De Trinitate libri XV”. Patrologia cursus completus. Series Latina (ed. J.-P. Migne). T. 42. Parisiis: Excudebatur et venit apud J.-P. Migne editorem: 819–1098.
Avicenna (1977) Avicenna Latinus. Liber de philosophia prima sive scientia divina. Vol. 1 (libri I–IV) (édition critique de la trad. latine médiévale par S. Van Riet, intr. doctrinale par G. Verbeke). Louvain: Peeters; Leiden: Brill.
Avicenna (1980) Avicenna Latinus. Liber de philosophia prima sive scientia divina. Vol. 2 (libri V–X) (édition critique de la trad. latine médiévale par S. Van Riet, intr. doctrinale par G. Verbeke). Louvain: Peeters; Leiden: Brill.
Bonaventura OFM (1882) S. Bonaventurae Opera omnia. Ed. studio et cura PP. Collegii a S. Bonaventura. T. I. Commentaria in IV libros Sententiarum. In Primum librum Sententiarum. Ad claras Aquas: Ex typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae.
Decretales Gregorii IX (1881) “Decretalium Gregorii papae IX compilationis libri V”. Corpus Iuris Canonici. Pars 2: Decretalium Collectiones (ed. E. L. Richter et E. Friedberg). Leipzig: Bernhard Tauchnitz: 1–928.
Duns Scotus OFM (1950–2013) “Ioannis Duns Scoti OFM Ordinatio I–IV”. Ioannis Duns Scoti Opera omnia. Vol. I–XIV. Studio et cura Commissionis Scotisticae ad fidem codicum edita, praeside Carolo Balić. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.
Duns Scotus OFM (1960–2004) “Ioannis Duns Scoti OFM Lectura I–III”. Ioannis Duns Scoti Opera omnia. Vol. XVI–XXI. Studio et cura Commissionis Scotisticae ad fidem codicum edita, praeside Carolo Balić. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.
Duns Scotus OFM (1968) Ioannis Duns Scoti Quaestiones Quodlibetales. — Juan Duns Escoto. Cuestiones Cuodlibetales (ed. bilingüe, intr., resúmenes y versión de F. Alluntis). Madrid: La Editorial Católica (Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos. Vol. 277).
Duns Scotus OFM (1994) Tractatus de primo principio. — Abhandlung über das erste Prinzip (hg., übers. v. W. Kluxen). 3. Aufl. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (Texte zur Forschung).
Duns Scotus OFM (1997a) “Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis. Libri I–V” (ed. a G. Etzkorn, R. Andrews, G. Gál, R. Green, F. Kelly, G. Marcil, T. Noone, R. Wood). B. Ioannis Duns Scoti OFM Opera Philosophica. Vol. III. St. Bonaventure, New York: The Franciscan Institute.
Duns Scotus OFM (1997b) “Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis. Libri VI–IX” (ed. a G. Etzkorn, R. Andrews, G. Gál, R. Green, F. Kelly, G. Marcil, T. Noone, R. Wood). B. Ioannis Duns Scoti OFM Opera Philosophica. Vol. IV. St. Bonaventure, New York: The Franciscan Institute.
Duns Scotus OFM (2004a) The Examined Report of the Paris Lecture: Reportatio I–A. Latin Text and English Translation (tr., ed. by A. B. Wolter, O. V. Bychkov). Vol. 1: Prologus, dist. 1–21. St. Bonaventure, New York: Franciscan Institute.
Duns Scotus OFM (2004b) “Theoremata” (ed. a M. Dreyer, H. Möhle, G. Krieger). B. Ioannis Duns Scoti OFM Opera Philosophica. Vol. II. St. Bonaventure, New York: Franciscan Institute; Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press: 593–721.
Duns Scotus OFM (2006) “Quaestiones super secundum et tertium De anima” (ed . a C. Bazán, K. Emery, R. Green, T. Noone, R. Plevano, A. Traver). B. Ioannis Duns Scoti OFM Opera Philosophica. Vol. V. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press; St. Bonaventure, New York: Franciscan Institute.
Duns Scotus OFM (2008) The Examined Report of the Paris Lecture: Reportatio I–A. Latin Text and English Translation (tr., ed. by A. B. Wolter, O. V. Bychkov). Vol. 2: dist. 22–48. St. Bonaventure, New York: Franciscan Institute.
Duns Scotus OFM (2014) “Ioannis Duns Scoti Quaestio de formalitatibus quae dicitur Logica Scoti”. The Quaestio de formalitatibus by John Duns Scotus, sometimes called the Logica Scoti (ed. by K. Jr. Emery, G. R. Smith). Bulletin de philosophie médiévale. Vol. 56: 153–182.
Duns Scotus OFM (2015) “Ordinatsiya. Kniga I. Distinktsiya 43 i parallel’nye teksty” [Ordinatio. Book I. Distinction 43 and parallel texts] (tr., notes by V. L. Ivanov). Mnogolikaya sofistika: Nelegitimnaya argumentatsiya v intellektual’noi kul’ture Evropy Srednikh vekov i rannego Novogo vremeni [The Many-faced Sophistic: The Illegitimate argumentation in the European intellectual culture of the Middle Ages and Early Modern time] (ed. by P. V. Sokolov). Moscow: HSE Publishing House: 26–57. (in Russian).
Euclides (1983) The First Latin Translation of Euclid’s Elements Commonly Ascribed to Adelard of Bath. A critical edition of books I–VIII and books X.36–XV.2 (ed. by H. L. L. Busard). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies (Studies and Texts. Vol. 64).
Franciscus de Mayronis (1961) François de Meyronnes — Pierre Roger. Disputatio (1320–1321) (éd. critique par J. Barbet). Paris: Vrin (Textes philosophiques du Moyen Âge. Vol. 9).
Godefridus de Fontibus (1904) Godefridi de Fontibus. Les quatre premiers Quodlibets (éd. par M. De Wulf, A. Pelzer). Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie de l’Université.
Henricus a Gandavo (1518) Quodlibeta Magistri Henrici Goethals a Gandavo. Parisii: In aedibus Iodoci Badii Ascensii.
Henricus a Gandavo (1520) Henrici a Gandavo Summa quaestionum ordinarium. Tomi II. Parisii: In aedibus Iodoci Badii Ascensii.
Henricus de Gandavo (1987) Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia. T. XVI. Quodlibet XII. Quaestiones 1–30 (ed. a G. A. Wilson, J. Decorte). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Henricus de Gandavo (2011) Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia. T. VIII. Quodlibet IV (ed. a G. A. Wilson G. Etzkorn). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Hervaeus Natalis OP (2011) De quattuor materiis sive Determinationes contra magistrum Henricum de Gandavo. Vol. I: Tractatus de formis. De unitate formae substantialis in eodem supposito. A critical Edition from Selected Manuscripts (ed. by L. M. De Rijk). Turnhout: Brepols Publishers (Studia Artistarum. Vol. 31).
Iohannes Damascenus (1864) “Expositio Fidei Orthodoxae”. Patrologia cursus completus. Series Graeca (ed. J.-P. Migne). T. 94. Parisiis: Excudebatur et venit apud J.-P. Migne editorem: 789–1228.
Petrus Hispanus (1972) Peter of Spain (Petrus Hispanus). Tractatus, (also known as Summulae logicales) (critical ed., intr. by L.M. de Rijk). Assen: Van Gorcum & Co.
Petrus Lombardus (1855) “Sententiarum Libri Quatuor”. Patrologia cursus completus. Series Latina (ed. J.-P. Migne). T. 192. Parisiis: Apud Garnier Fratres, Editores et J.-P. Migne Successores: 519–964.
Petrus Thomae OFM (2000) “Petrus Thomae’s De Distinctione Predicamentorum (With A Working Edition)” (ed. E. P. Bos). The Winged Chariot: Collected Essays on Plato and Platonism in Honor of L. M. de Rijk (ed. by M. Kardaun, J. Spruyt). Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill (Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History. Vol. 100): 277–312.
Richardus de Sancto Victore (1855) “De Trinitate”. Patrologia cursus completus. Series Latina (ed. J.-P. Migne). T. 196. Parisiis: Excudebatur et venit apud J.-P. Migne editorem: 887–992.
Suárez SJ (1960–1966) Francisco Suárez SJ Disputationes Metaphysicae — Disputaciones metafísicas. Vol. I–VII (ed., tr. S. Rábade Romeo, S. Caballero Sánchez, A. Puigcerver Zanón). Madrid: Gredos.
Thomas Aquinas OP (1888) Sancti Thomae de Aquino OP Opera omnia (editio Leonina). Tomus IV. Summae Theologiae, Pars I, a quaestione I ad quaestionem XLIX. Romae: Ex Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide.
Thomas Aquinas OP (1889) Sancti Thomae de Aquino OP Opera omnia (editio Leonina). Tomus V. Summae Theologiae, Pars I, a quaestione L ad quaestionem CXIX. Romae: Ex Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide.
Thomas Aquinas OP (1996) Sancti Thomae de Aquino OP Opera omnia (editio Leonina). Tomus XXIV. Pars 1. Quaestiones disputatae de anima (ed. B. C. Bazán). Roma: Commissio Leonina; Paris: Éditions du Cerf.
Thomas Aquinas OP (2000) Sancti Thomae de Aquino OP Opera omnia (editio Leonina). Tomus XXIV. Pars 2. Quaestio disputata de spiritualibus creaturis (ed. J. Cos). Roma: Commissio Leonina; Paris: Éditions du Cerf.
Studies and reference literature
Adams McCord M. (1976) “Ockham on Identity and Distinction”. Franciscan Studies. Vol. 36: 5–74.
Bäck A. (2000) “The Formal Structure of Scotus’ Formal Distinction”. Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain: Acts of the 12th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics, held at the University of Navarre (Pamplona, 26–30 May 1997) (ed. by I. Angelelli, P. Perez-Ilzarbe). Hildesheim; Zürich; New York: Georg Olms Verlag (Philosophische Texte und Studien. Bd. 54): 411–438.
Blander J. (2014) Dependence, Separability, and Theories of Identity and Distinction in Late Medieval Philosophy: Case Studies from Scotus and Ockham (PhD dissertation. Los Angeles. University of California).
Borak H. (1966) “De fundamento distinctionis formalis scotisticae”. Laurentianum. Vol. 6: 157–181.
Connors C. (2009) “Scotus and Ockham: Individuation and the Formal Distinction”. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association. Vol. 83: 141–153.
Conti A. D. (1993) “Sviluppi e applicazioni della distinzione formale scotista ad Oxford sul finire del XIV secolo”. Via Scoti: Methodologia ad mentem Joannis Duns Scoti. Atti del Congresso Scotistico Internazionale Roma 9–11 marzo 1993 (a cura di L. Sileo). T. 1. Rome: Edizioni Antonianum: 319–336.
Cross R. (2004) “Scotus’s Parisian Teaching on Divine Simplicity”. Duns Scot à Paris, 1302–2002. Actes du colloque de Paris, 2–4 septembre 2002 (éd. par O. Boulnois, E. Karger, J.-L. Solère, G. Sondag). Turnhout: Brepols Publishers (Textes et études du Moyen Âge. Vol. 26): 519–562.
Dumont S. D. (2005) “Duns Scotus’s Parisian Question on the Formal Distinction”. Vivarium. Vol. 43. Issue 1: 7–62.
Friedman R. (2010) Medieval Trinitarian Thought from Aquinas to Ockham. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Friedman R. (2013) Intellectual Traditions at the Medieval University: The Use of Philosophical Psychology in Trinitarian Theology among the Franciscans and Dominicans, 1250–1350. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters. Bd. 108. Teil. 1–2).
Fuchs M. J. (2014) “Univozität und Distinktion. Metaphysische Grundstrukturen bei Duns Scotus, Suárez, Descartes und Spinoza”. Suárez’s Metaphysics in Its Historical and Systematic Context (ed. by L. Novák). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter (Contemporary Scholasticism. Vol. 2): 105–116.
Gaus C. (2008) Etiam realis scientia: Petrus Aureolis Konzeptualistische Transzendentalienlehre vor dem Hintergrund seiner Kritik am Formalitätenrealismus. Leiden: Brill.
Gelber H. G. (1974) Logic and the Trinity: A Clash of Values in Scholastic Thought, 1300–1335 (PhD dissertation. Madison. University of Wisconsin).
Henninger M. G. (1981) “Henry of Harclay on the Formal Distinction in the Trinity”. Franciscan Studies. Vol. 41: 250–335.
Ivanov V. L. (2010) “Intensivnaya velichina sovershenstva: Beskonechnost’ kak sushchestvennoe ponyatie v teologii i filosofii Ioanna Dunsa Skota” [The intensive magnitude of perfection: The Infinity as the essential concept in the theology and philosophy of John Duns Scotus, OFM]. Kosmos i Dusha. Vyp. 2. Ucheniya o prirode i myshlenii v Antichnosti, Srednie veka i Novoe vremya (stat’i i perevody) [Cosmos and Soul. Issue 2. Teachings on Nature and Mind in Antiquity, the Middle Ages and Modern time (articles and translations)] (ed. by A. V. Seryogin). Moscow: Progress–Tradition: 379–431. (in Russian).
Jordan M. J. (1984) Duns Scotus on the Formal Distinction (PhD dissertation. New Brunswick, New Jersey. Rutgers University).
Jordan M. J. (1985) “What’s New in Ockham’s Formal Distinction?” Franciscan Studies. Vol. 45: 97–110.
Kaufmann M. (1995) “Ockham’s Criticism of the Formal Distinction — A Mere ‘petitio principii’?” Via Scoti: Methodologia ad mentem Joannis Duns Scoti. Atti del Congresso Scotistico Internazionale Roma 9–11 marzo 1993 (a cura di L. Sileo). T. 1. Rome: Edizioni Antonianum: 337–347.
Kraml H. (1995) “Beobachtungen zum Ursprung der ‘distinctio formalis’” Via Scoti: Methodologia ad mentem Joannis Duns Scoti. Atti del Congresso Scotistico Internazionale Roma 9–11 marzo 1993 (a cura di L. Sileo). T. 1. Rome: Edizioni Antonianum: 305–318.
Martin Chr. J. (2000) “Logic for Distinctions: Peter of Navarre and the Scotistic Treatment of Impossible Hypotheses”. Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain: Acts of the 12th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics, held at the University of Navarre (Pamplona, 26–30 May 1997) (ed. by I. Angelelli, P. Perez-Ilzarbe). Hildesheim; Zürich; New York: Georg Olms Verlag (Philosophische Texte und Studien. Bd. 54): 439–463.
Mensching G. (1998) “Zur transzendentalphilosophischen Bedeutung der distinctio formalis bei Johannes Duns Scotus”. Was ist Philosophie im Mittelalter? Qu’est-ce que la philosophie au Moyen Age? What is Philosophy in the Middle Ages? Akten des X. Internationalen Kongresses für mittelalterliche Philosophie der Société Internationale pour l’Étude de la Philosophie Médiévale, 25. bis 30. August 1997 in Erfurt (hg. v. J. A. Aertsen, A. Speer). Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter (Miscellanea mediaevalia. Bd. 26): 543–549.
Muñoz C. P. D. (2015) “La distinctio formalis ex natura rei en la filosofía de Juan Duns Escoto como antecedente del planteo de la objetividad”. Alpha. No. 41: 23–39.
Noone T. B. (1993) “Alnwick on the Origin, Nature and Function of the Formal Distinction». Franciscan Studies. Vol. 53: 231–261.
Noone T. B. (2009) “Ascoli, Wylton, and Alnwick on Scotus’s Formal Distinction: Taxonomy, Refinement, and Interaction”. Philosophical Debates at Paris in the Early Fourteenth Century (ed. by S. F. Brown, T. Dewender, T. Kobusch). Leiden; Boston: Brill (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters. Bd. 102): 127–149.
Noone T. B. (1999) “La distinction formelle dans l’école scotiste”. Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques. T. 83: 53–72.
Schmidt A. (2004) “Die Unvermeidlichkeit der distinctio formalis: Naturphilosophische Reflexionen zu einem zentralen Lehrstück des Johannes Duns Scotus”. Wissenschaft und Weisheit. Bd. 67: 96–118.
Smith G. R. (2013) The Problem of Divine Attributes from Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus (PhD dissertation. Notre Dame, Indiana. Notre Dame University).
Swindler J. K. (1988) “The Formal Distinction”. Southwest Philosophy Review. Vol. 4. No. 1: 71–77.
Thornton R. (2015) “From Theology through Metaphysics to Logic: John Duns Scotus’s Account of the Trinity without the ‘Formal Distinction’”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. Vol. 89. No. 4: 585–602.
Vdovina G. V. (2015) “O ponyatii notio i notsional’nykh imenakh v trinitarnom bogoslovii srednevekovogo Zapada” [On the concept of notio and notional names in the Trinitarian theology of the medieval West]. Mera veshchei. Chelovek v istorii evropeiskoi mysli [The Measure of Things. Man in the history of European thought] (ed. by G. V. Vdovina). Moscow: Akvilon: 168–190. (in Russian).
Wengert R. G. (1965) “The Development of the Doctrine of the Formal Distinction in the Lectura Prima of John Duns Scotus”. The Monist. No. 49: 571–587.
Wolter A. B. (1965) “The Formal Distinction”. John Duns Scotus 1265–1965 (ed. by J. K. Ryan, B. M. Bonansea). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy. Vol. 3): 61–82 (Reprinted in: The Philosophical Theology of John Duns Scotus (ed. by M. Adams McCord). Ithaca, New York; London: Cornell University Press (Cornell Studies in the Philosophy of Religion), 1990: 27–41).
© Vitaliy Ivanov, 2016