Sven K. Knebel. Tradition as an archeological category. Vol. 3. No. 1. 2018

HTML

Publication Details

Tradition as an archeological category
Title in the language of publication: Традиция как археологическая категория
Author:
Sven K. Knebel
Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Institute of Philosophy at the Free University of Berlin.
Address: Habelschwerdter Allee, Berlin 14195, Germany.
Translated from German
Vitaliy Ivanov
Research Fellow at the Research and Education Center for Religion, Philosophy, and Culture Studies at St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation, Associate Research Fellow at the Sociological institute of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Address: 67A Bolshaya Morskaia str., Saint-Petersburg, 190000, Russia.

Maria Varlamova
PhD in Philosophy, Research Fellow at the Research and Education Center for Religion, Philosophy, and Culture Studies at St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation, Associate Research Fellow at the Sociological institute of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Address: 67A Bolshaya Morskaia str., Saint-Petersburg, 190000, Russia.
Issue:
P. 15–33.
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
 
   PDF

Abstract

Sven K. Knebel (born 1958) is a renowned German hictorian of philosophy, a specialist in Late Scholasticism and peripatetic philosophic tradition. He is a disciple of Wolfgang Hübener and Jacob Taubes. The essay “Tradition as an archeological category” was published by Knebel with the subtitle “A hermeneutic afterword” as a methodological afterword to his book “In genere latent aequivocationes. On the tradition of critique of universals over the spirit of dieresis” (1989), dedicated to the history of the concept of universal unity of genus and to a research of complicated interaction of Platonic and Aristotelic tradition within the frames of teachings on univocation and equivocation of genus and species in the period from Plato and Aristotle to the High Scholasticism of the XIV century. In this essay, Knobel attempts to rehabilitate the concept of tradition, namely its paradigmatic case which the metaphysical tradition of philosophic knowledge appears, in respect of the methodological frames of Michel Foucault’s archeology of knowledge. He demonstrates that the tradition of metaphysics as a special discourse on “beings as beings” in its contiuity is neither an echo of primordial meaning of Being represented in a philosophical statement, nor a sign of primordial authorial intention (traditional hermeneutics), nor a mystery of signifier disavowing this primordial sense (deconstruction) or transforming it into an allegory of “unspoken between the lines”, into a latent discourse of unconscious (psychoanalysis), nor a speculative assertion (idealistic dialectics). On the contrary, as an empirically given order of terminological differentias, the logical and metaphysical tradition proves to be a type of non-representing discourse, which, instead of representation of the transcendental signified, is from the very beginning ever present beyond its own significations. For the metaphysical discourse, its elements, continuity of tradition and terminological differentias, correlate as a continuity of illusion of representation of pure signified and as an order of discourse constantly differentiating this continuity in the empirically fixated significations of terms and thus disclosing the illusiveness of this illusion of continuity, that is, its a priori necessity, which varies in each case. The practice of archeology of knowledge claims to detect within the orders of empirically given discourses their historical a priori, that is, an irreducible to the normativity of utterances condition of reality of actually uttered and, thus, it methodologically embodies proper form and actuality of the discourse of logical and metaphysical tradition.

Keywords

Archeology of knowledge, hermeneutics, history of concepts, tradition, historical a priori, terminology of metaphysic.

References 

Adorno Th. W. (1958) “Der Essay als Form”. Adorno T. W. Noten zur Literatur. Bd. I–IV. Bd. I. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag: 9–49.

Adorno Th. W. (1973) “Die Aktualität der Philosophie”. Adorno T. W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. 1–20. Bd. 1. Philosophische Frühschriften (hg. v. R. Tiedemann). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag: 325–344.

Albertus Magnus (1968) “De anima” (ed. Cl. Stroick). Sancti doctoris ecclesiae Alberti Magni Opera Omnia edenda curavit Institutum Alberti Magni Coloniense Bernhardo Geyer praeside. Tomus 7. Pars 1. Monasterii Westfalorum [Münster]: In aedibus Aschendorff.

Annatus P. (1701) Methodicus ad positivam Theologiam Apparatus. Venetiis: Apud Paulum Balleonium.

Aubenque P. (1962) Le problème de l’être chez Aristote. Essai sur la problématique aristotélicienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Bibliothèque de philosophie contemporaine).

Benjamin W. (1974) “Der Begriff der Kunstkritik in der deutschen Romantik”. Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. I–VII. Bd. I. Teil. 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag: 7–122.

Benjamin W. (1982) “Das Passagen-Werk”. Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. I–VII. Bd. V. Teil. 1–2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Bolz N. W. (1979) “Der Geist und die Buchstaben. Friedrich Schlegels hermeneutische Postulate”. Texthermeneutik. Aktualität, Geschichte, Kritik (hg. v. U. Nassen). Paderborn; München; Wien; Zürich: Ferdinand Schoeningh: 79–113.

Bolz N. W. (1985) “Stop making sense!” Berliner Tageszeitung. 8. Januar. S. 10.

Derrida J. (1974) Grammatologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Derrida J. (2000) De la grammatologie. Moscow: Ad Marginem. (In Russian).

Dilthey W. (1927) Gesammelte Schriften. Bd.7: Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. Leipzig; Berlin: Verlag von B. G. Teubner.

Dörrie H. (1976) “Was ist ‘spätantiker Platonismus’? Überlegungen zur Grenzziehung zwischen Platonismus und Christentum”. Dörrie H. Platonica minora (hg. v. V. Buchheit). München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag (Studia et Testimonia Antiqua. Vol. 8): 508–523.

Duns Scotus (1960) “Ioannis Duns Scoti OFM Lectura prologus; Lectura I, dist. 1–7”. Ioannis Duns Scoti Opera omnia. T. XVI. Studio et cura Commissionis Scotisticae ad fidem codicum edita, praeside Carolo Balić (ed. a C. Balić, M. Bodewig, S. Bušelić, P. Čapkun-Delić, B. Hechich, I. Jurić, B. Korošak, L. Modrić, S. Nanni, I. Reinhold, O. Schäfer). Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.

Foucault M. (1971) Die Ordnung der Dinge. Eine Archäologie der Humanwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag (Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch Wissenschaft. Bd. 96).

Foucault M. (1973) Archäologie des Wissens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Foucault M. (1982) Die Ordnung des Diskurses. Inauguralvorlesung am Collège de France, 2. Dezember 1970. Frankfurt am Main; Berlin; Wien: Ullstein Verlag.

Foucault M. (1994) Les Mots et les Choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. St. Petersburg: A-cad. (In Russian).

Foucault M. (1996) “L’ordre du discours. Lecon inaugurale au College de France prononcee le 2 decembre 1970”. Foucault M. The Will to Truth: On the far side of Knowledge, Power and Sexuality. Works of various years. Moscow: Kastal’: 47–96. (In Russian).

Foucault M. (2004) LArchéologie du savoir. St. Petersburg: Gumanitarnaya Akademiya; Universitetskaya kniga (Ars Pura. Francuzskaya kollekciya [Ars Pura. French collection]). (In Russian).

Gadamer H.-G. (1972) Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. 3., erweiterte Auflage. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

Gadamer H.-G. (1988) Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).

Hübener W. (1982) “Die Ehe des Merkurius und der Philologie — Prolegomena zu einer Theorie der Philosophiegeschichte”. Wer hat Angst vor der Philosophie? Eine Einführung in Philosophie (hg. v. N. W. Bolz). Paderborn; München; Wien; Zürich: Ferdinand Schoeningh: 137–196.

Knebel S. К. (1986) “‘Geschichtlichkeit’, oder: Der Buchstabe des Grafen Yorck”. Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte. Bd. 38. Heft 4: 359–369.

Masterman M. (1974) “Die Natur eines Paradigmas”. Kritik und Erkenntnisfortschritt. Abhandlungen des Internationalen Kolloquiums über die Philosophie der Wissenschaft. London 1965. Bd. 4 (hg. v. I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave). Braunschweig: Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (Wissenschaftstheorie. Wissenschaft und Philosophie. Bd. 9): 59–88.

Pastine D. (1972) “Caramuel contro Descartes: Obiezioni inedite alle ‘Meditazioni’ di Cartesio; Caramuel y Lobkowitz J. Animadversiones in Meditationes cartesianas, quibus demonstratur clarissime nihil demonstrari a Cartesio”. Rivista critica di storia della filosofia. Vol. 27. No. 2: 177–221.

Pepperle H., Pepperle I. (hg.) (1985) Die Hegelsche Linke. Dokumente zu Philosophie und Politik im deutschen Vormärz. Leipzig: Verlag P. Reclam jun.

Petrus Aureоlus (1956) Scriptum super primum Sententiarum (ed. E. M. Buytaert). T. II. Distinctions II–VIII. St. Bonaventure, New York: The Franciscan Institute.

Plato (1899–1906) Platonis opera (recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit I. Burnet). T. I–V. Oxford: Clarendon Press (Scriptorum Classicorum Bibliotheca Oxoniensis).

Proclus (1963) The elements of theology (a revised text, tr., intr., comment. by E. R. Dodds). Second Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Schelling F. W. J. (1974) Philosophie der Offenbarung. Bd. I. Unveränd. reprogr. Nachdr. d. aus d. handschriftl. Nachlaß hg. Ausg. v. 1858. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Schelling F. W. J. (2000) Philosophie der Offenbarung. V 2 t. T. 1 [In 2 vol. Vol. 1]. St. Petersburg: Nauka (Slovo o sushchem [Word on the Being]). (In Russian).

Schlegel F. (1963a) “Philosophische Fragmente. Zweite Epoche. I. [1798–1799]”. Schlegel F. Kritische Ausgabe seiner Werke. Abt. II: Schriften aus dem Nachlass. Bd. 18. Philosophische Lehrjahre 1796–1806 nebst philosophischen Manuskripten aus den Jahren 1796–1828 (einleitung, kommentar, hg. v. E. Behler). Erster Teil. München; Paderborn; Wien: Ferdinand Schoeningh: 195–321.

Schlegel F. (1963b) “Philosophische Fragmente. Zweite Epoche. II. [1798–1801]”. Schlegel F. Kritische Ausgabe seiner Werke. Abt. II: Schriften aus dem Nachlass. Bd. 18. Philosophische Lehrjahre 1796–1806 nebst philosophischen Manuskripten aus den Jahren 1796–1828 (einleitung, kommentar, hg. v. E. Behler). Erster Teil. München; Paderborn; Wien: Ferdinand Schoeningh: 323–422.

Schleiermacher F. (1977) “Hermeneutik und Kritik. Mit Besonderer Beziehung auf das Neue Testament”. Schleiermacher F. D. E. Hermeneutik und Kritik. Mit einem Anhang sprachphilosophischer Texte Schleiermachers (hg., eingel. v. M. Frank). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag: 69–306.

Thomas Aquinas (1888) “Sancti Thomae de Aquino OP Summae Theologiae Pars I, a quaestione I ad quaestionem XLIX”. Thomas Aquinas OP. Opera omnia (editio Leonina). Tomus IV. Romae: Ex Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide.

© Sven K. Knebel, 2018  © Vitaliy Ivanov, transl., 2018  © Maria Varlamova, transl., 2018

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.