Monk Diodor (Larionov). John Demetracopoulos and his contribution to the studies of “Byzantine Palamism”. A foreword to publication of Russian translation of the article “Is Gregory Palamas an existentialist? The restoration of the true meaning of his comment on Exodus 3,14 “Ἐγώ εἰμι ὁ ὤν””. Vol. 4. No. 1. 2019

Publication Details

John Demetracopoulos and his contribution to the studies of “Byzantine Palamism”. A foreword to publication of Russian translation of the article “Is Gregory Palamas an existentialist? The restoration of the true meaning of his comment on Exodus 3,14 “Ἐγώ εἰμι ὁ ὤν””
Title in the language of publication: Яннис Димитракопулос и его работы по «византийскому паламизму». Предисловие к публикации русского перевода статьи «Григорий Палама — экзистенциалист? Реконструкция подлинного значения его комментария на Исх. 3:14: “Ἐγώ εἰμι ὁ ὤν”»
Author:
Monk Diodor (Larionov)
Inmate of Bogoroditse-Sergieva hermitage, librarian.
Address: Bogoroditse-Sergieva hermitage 425270, Mari El Republic, Kilemarsky District, Russia.
Issue:
P. 282–305.
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.31119/essephts.2019.4.1.9
 

Abstract

Giannis Demetracopoulos (born 1968) is a modern Greek historian of philosophy, an author of series of researches on Byzantine and Modern Greek philosophy. He is a head of the international project “Thomas de Aquino Byzantinus”, a member of the International society for Medieval philosophy studies in the section of Byzantine philosophy. The present article is a foreword to the translation of his work “Is Gregory Palamas an existentialist? The restoration of the true meaning of his comment on Exodus 3:14 “Ἐγώ εἰμι ὁ ὤν””, which was published in 1996 in Athens by “Παρουσία” editorial as a separate monograph. The article explains the reasons for actuality of this translation into Russian and provides information on life and studies of the author. The main part of the foreword is an analytic review of further writings by J. Demetracopoulos on the problems of “Byzantine Palamism”, written by him in 1996-2011. The methodology, which the scholar applies in the studies of Palamism, is discussed in the paper, as well as the conceptual contribution he brought into examination and interpretation of heritage both of Gregory Palamas himself and subsequent Byzantine and Modern Greek authors having participated in the post-Palamite discussions. A detailed description is given of the sources of philosophical and theological views of Gregory Palamas, which have been introduced into scholarly circulation by J. Demetracopoulos, aiding to clarification of the evolution of the Byzantine saint’s views and to better understanding his position in discussions with his opponents. Serious attention is paid to Demetracopoulos’ works on the relation of Gregory Palamas to the legacy of St. Augustine and his reception of the philosophical and theological views of the latter. Additionally, in the article a brief criticism of some Demetracopoulos’ statements on the issue of “transformation of Palamism” in the late Byzantium is contained.

Keywords

Byzantine philosophy, palamism, Gregory Palamas, Avgustine, existentialism.

References 

Chrestou P. Κ. (ed.) (1992) “<Grēgorioy toy Palama> Kephalaia Ekaton Pentēkonta” [<Gregory Palamas’> One hundred and fifty chapters]. Grēgorioy toy Palama Syggrammata. T. E. [Complete Writings of Gregory Palamas. Vol. 5] (ed. by P. Κ. Chrestou). Thessaloniki: Ekdoseis Kyromanos: 37–119. (in Greek).

Congourdeau M.-H. (éd.) (1989) Nicolas Cabasilas. La Vie en Christ. Livres IIV. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et annotation. Paris: Éditions du Cerf (Sources Chrétiennes. Vol. 355).

Demetracopoulos J. A. (1996) Is Gregory Palamas an existentialist? The restoration of the true meaning of his comment on Exodus 3,14 “Ἐγώ εἰμι ὤν. Athens: Parousia.

Demetracopoulos J. A. (1997) Aygoystinos kai Grēgorios Palamas: ta problēmata tōn aristotelikōn katēgoriōn kais triadikēs psychotheologias [Augustine and Gregory Palamas. Aristotle’s Categories and the Psychological Images of the Holy Trinity]. Athens: Parousia. (in Greek).

Demetracopoulos J. A. (1998) “Nicholas Cabasilas’ ‘Quaestio de Rationis Valore’. An Anti-Palamite Defense of Secular Wisdom”. Byzantina. Vol. 19: 53–93.

Demetracopoulos J. A. (1999) Nikolaoy Kabasila “Kata Pyrrōnos”. Platōnikos philoskeptikismos kai aristotelikos antiskeptikismos stē byzantinē dianoēsē toy 14oy aiōna [Nicholas Cabasilas’ Contra Pyrrhonem. Platonic philoscepticism and Aristotelian antiscepticism in the Byzantine discourse of the XIV century]. Athens: Parousia. (in Greek).

Demetracopoulos J. A. (1999) “Bibliokrisia: Moschos D. N. Platōnismos ē christianismos; Oi philosophikes proypotheseis toy antiēsychasmoy toy Nikēphoroy Grēgora (1293–1361). Athens: Parousia, 1998. ss. 319” [Review: Moschos D. N. Platonism or Christianity? The philosophical presuppositions of the Nicephoros Gregoras’ opposition to Hesychasm (1293–1361). Athens: Parousia, 1998. pp. 319]. Byzantiaka. Vol. 19: 403–418. (in Greek).

Demetracopoulos J. A. (2000) “Grēgorioy Palama, Kephalaia ekaton pentēkonta, 1–14: ‘Peri kosmoy’. Keimeno, metaphrash kai ermineytika scholia” [Gregory Palamas One Hundred and Fifty Chapters 1–14: “De Mundi”. Text, translation and hermeneutic commentaries]. Byzantiaka. Vol. 20: 293–348. (in Greek).

Demetracopoulos J. A. (2001) “Ysterobyzantinē kosmologia. Ē kritikē toy Grēgorioy Palama stē didaskalia tōn Plōtinoy kai Prokloy peri Kosmikēs Psychēs (Meros prōtos)” [Late Byzantine Cosmology. Gregory Palamas’ Criticism on the Plotinus’ and Proclus’ Teaching of the World Soul (Part I)]. Philosophia. Vol. 31: 175–191. (in Greek).

Demetracopoulos J. A. (2002) “Ysterobyzantinē kosmologia. Ē kritikē toy Grēgorioy Palama stē didaskalia tōn Plōtinoy kai Prokloy peri Kosmikēs Psychēs (Meros deyteros)” [Late Byzantine Cosmology. Gregory Palamas’ Criticism on the Plotinus’ and Proclus’ Teaching of the World Soul (Part II)]. Philosophia. Vol. 32: 111–132. (in Greek).

Demetracopoulos J. A. (2003) “New Evidence on the Ancient, Patristic, and Byzantine Sources of Barlaam the Calabrian’s ‘Contra Latinos’”. Byzantinische Zeitschrift. Bd. 96. Heft 1: 83–122.

Demetracopoulos J. A. (2004) “Ens — unum — bonum: ē peri theias energeias christianikē didaskalia tōn Iōannoy Kaisareias kai Iōannoy Kyparissiōtoy ōs pēgē tēs thyrathen didaskalias toy Geōrgioy Gemistoy-Plēthōnos gia tēn actio divina (praxis)” [Ens — unum — bonum: John of Caesareia’s and John Cyparissiotes’ Christian Teaching of the Divine Energy as a Source of the George Gemistos Plethon’s Outdoor Teaching of the Actio Divina (Praxis)]. Byzantiaka. Vol. 24: 351–362. (in Greek).

Demetracopoulos J. A. (2010) “‘Échos d’Orient — Résonances d’Ouest’. In Respect of: C. G. Conticello, V. Conticello, éds. ‘La théologie byzantine et sa tradition. II: XIIIe–XIXe s.’” Nicolaus. Rivista di Teologia Ecumenico-Patristica. Anno XXXVII. Fasc. 2: 67–148.

Demetracopoulos J. A. (2011) “Palamas Transformed. Palamite Interpretations of the Distinction between God’s ‘Essence’ and ‘Energies’ in Late Byzantium”. Greeks, Latins, and Intellectual History 1204–1500 (ed. by C. Schabel, M. Hinterberger). Leuven; Walpole, MA: Peeters Publishers (Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales. Bibliotheca. Bd. 11): 263–371.

Dunaev A. G. (2009) “Bogoslovie Evharistii v kontekste palamitskih sporov” [Theology of Eucharist in the context of the Palamite polemics]. Bogoslovskie trudy. Vyp. 42 [Theological Works. Vol. 42]: 146–168. (in Russian).

Flasch K. (1980) Augustin. Einführung in Sein Denken. Stuttgart: Reclam Verlag (Reclams Universal-Bibliothek).

Flogaus R. (1996a) “De heimliche Blick nach Westen. Zur Rezeption von Augustinus’ De trinitate durch Gregorios Palamas”. Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik. Bd. 46: 275–297.

Flogaus R. (1996b) Theosis bei Palamas und Luther: Ein Beitrag zum ökumenischen Gespräch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (Forschungen zur systematischen und ökumenischen Theologie. Bd. 78).

Flogaus R. (1998) “Palamas and Barlaam Revisited: A Reassessment of East and West in the Hesychast Controversy of 14th century Byzantium”. St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly. Vol. 42: 1–32.

Henry P. (1960) Saint Augustine on Personality. The Saint Augustine Lecture 1959. New York: Macmillan Company (The Saint Augustine Lecture Series).

Karmiris I. (1960) Ta Dogmatika kai Symbolika Mnēmeia tēs Orthodoxoy Katholikēs Ekklēsias. T. A´ [Dogmatic and symbolic monuments of the Orthodox Catholic Church. Vol. 1]. Athens: [s. n.]. (in Greek).

Knebel S. K. (2002) “Distinctio rationis ratiocinantis: Die scholastische Unterscheidungslehre vor dem Satz ‘A = A’”. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte. Bd. 44: 145–174.

Kretzmann N., Kenny A., Pinborg J. (eds.) (1982) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Larionov Diodor, monk (2009) “Dal’nejshie raz”yasneniya o problemah interpretatsii naslediya svyatitelya Grigoriya Palamy (V svyazi s “Otvetom” M. Yu. Reutina)” (Opublikovano: 29 oktyabrya 2009 g.) [Further clarification on the problems of interpreting the legacy of St. Gregory Palamas (in connection with the “Response” of M. Yu. Reutin) (Published October 29, 2009)]. Portal Bogoslov.Ru [The Internet portal “Bogoslov.Ru”]. Retrieved from http://archive.bogoslov.ru/text/494125.html (in Russian).

Lössl J. (1999) “Augustine’s On the Trinity in Gregory Palamas’ One Hundred and Fifty Chapters”. Augustine Studies. Vol. 30. No. 1: 61–82.

Lössl J. (2000) “Augustine in Byzantium”. Journal of Ecclesiastical History. Vol. 51. No. 2: 267–295.

Makarov D. I. (2003) Antropologiya i kosmologiya sv. Grigoriya Palamy (Na primere Gomiliy) [Anthrolopogy and Cosmology of St. Gregory Palamas (Through the example of homilies)]. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo Olega Abyshko (Biblioteka hristianskoj mysli. Issledovaniya [The Library of Christian Thought. Studies]). (in Russian).

Mantzaridou G. I. (ed.) (1966) “<Grēgorioy toy Palama> Peri enōseōs kai diakriseōs” [<Gregory Palamas’> On unity and division]. Grēgorioy toy Palama Syggrammata. T. B. [Complete Writings of Gregory Palamas. Vol. 2] (ed. by P. Κ. Chrestou). Thessaloniki: Ekdoseis Kyromanos: 69–95. (in Greek).

Matsouka N. A. (ed.) (1966) “<Grēgorioy toy Palama> Pros Gabran” [<Gregory Palamas’> To Gabra]. Grēgorioy toy Palama Syggrammata. T. B. [Complete Writings of Gregory Palamas. Vol. 2] (ed. by P. Κ. Chrestou). Thessaloniki: Ekdoseis Kyromanos: 325–362. (in Greek).

Paskhos P. B. (ed.) (2006) “O Matthaios Blastarēs perὶ tēs theias charitos ē perὶ toy theioy photos” [Matheus Blastares on the divine grace and on the divine light]. Antidōron tō mētropolitē Messēnias Chrysostomō Themelē. T. B [Hommage to Chrysistom Themeles, Metropolitan of Messina. Vol. 2]. Kalamata: [s. n.]: 291–326. (in Greek).

Sinkewicz R. E. (ed.) (1988) Saint Gregory Palamas. The One Hundred and Fifty Chapters. A Critical Edition, Translation and Study. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies (Studies and Texts. Vol. 83).

Tatakis B. N. (1949) La philosophie byzantine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (Histoire de la Philosophie, par E. Bréhier, deuxième fascicule supplémentaire).

Trizio M. (2006) “‘Un uomo sapiente ed apostolico’. Agostino a Bisanzio: Gregorio Palamas lettore del De Trinitate”. Quaestio. Vol. 6: 131–189.

Tsamis D. (ed.) (1976) Dabid Dysypatoy Logos kata Barlaam kai Akyndynoy pros Nikolaon Kabasilan [David Dysypates’ Word against Barlaam and Akyndinos for Nicholas Cabasila]. Thessaloniki: Kentron Byzantinōn ἐreynῶn (Byzantina keimena kai meletai. T. 10 [Byzantine texts and studies. Vol. 10]). (in Greek).

© Monk Diodor (Larionov), 2019

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.