Jérôme Lagouanère. Foucault patrologist. Vol. 5. No. 1-2. 2020

Publication Details

Foucault patrologist
Title in the language of publication: Фуко-патролог
Author:
Jérôme Lagouanère
PhD in History, Languages ​​and Ancient Civilizations, Lecturer-Researcher.
Paul Valéry Montpellier III University, Montpellier Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Human and Social Sciences.
Address: Route de Mende, 34199 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Translated from French: 
Sergey Gashkov
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor.
Baltic State Technical University «VOENMEH» named after D. F. Ustinov, Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics.
Address: 7 1st Krasnoarmeyskaya Street, St. Petersburg 190005, Russia.
Issue:
P. 57–75.
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.31119/essephts.2020.5.1-2.3
 
   PDF

Abstract

The publication of The Confessions of the Flesh (vol. IV of The History of Sexuality) constitutes an important Patristic and philosophical event by revealing the extent of Michel Foucault’s knowledge of Patristic literature. For demonstrating the contribution of Foucault to our knowledge of attitudes to sexuality on the part of Early Christians and his epistemological limits, this study analyzes the archeological method of his later period as well as his description of Christian virginity, interpretation of Augustine’s concept of sexual relations and other topics. But some of Foucault’s concepts should be placed in perspective. Due to specific mode of historicity which Foucault chooses, his archeology elaborates a narrative focused on the concepts of “governmentality” (gouvernementalité), truth, and subjectivity, which tends to even up historical nuances. Thus, after choosing the second century for analysis, Foucault consciously omits the study of all influences between Judaic and Christian prohibitions, between Gnosticism and Christianity, as well as impact of Philo of Alexandria and Apostle Paul on the formation of a Christian sexual ethics. In addition, some evidence justifiably used by Foucault could be interpreted by following approaches quite different from his hypothesis. Such an example is the spread of virginity among Christian women, which could be explained not only by the experience of cleansing the soul, adopted from monastic ascetic practices, but also by the emergence of a “new model of the feminine” which breaks apart from the model of the feminine as the patriarchal society saw it. Another example is Foucault’s identification of the subject of desire with the subject of right, which transforms the Augustine’s concept of libido into the source of the later codifications of sexual acts, neglects the positive aspect of Augustine’s thought. The subject recognizes the spontaneity of libido, “coiled in the hollows of the will,” and this recognition gives place to activity of divine grace establishing the order according to which the will receives the freedom as a medium between the subject and his actions.

Keywords

Foucault, patristics, sexuality, technology of the self, virginity, Augustin.

References 

Bochet I. (1982) Saint Augustin et le désir de Dieu. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes (Collection des Études augustiniennes. Série Antiquité. Vol. 95).

Brown P. (1995) Le renoncement à la chair. Virginité, célibat et continence dans le christianisme primitif (trad. par P.-E. Dauzat, C. Jacob). Paris: Gallimard (Bibliothèque des Histoires).

Chevallier P. (2011) Michel Foucault et le christianisme. Lyon: ENS (La croisée des chemins).

Corbin A. (2007) Histoire du christianisme. Pour mieux comprendre notre temps (éd. par A. Corbin, N. Lemaître, F. Thelamon, C. Vincent). Paris: Seuil (L’univers historique).

Dulaey M. (2000) “À quelle date Augustin a-t-il pris ses distances vis-à-vis du millénarisme?” Revue des Études Augustiniennes. Vol. 46. No. 1: 31–60.

Foucault M. (2010) Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France 1978–1979 (tr. by. A. V. Dyakov). St. Petersburg: Nauka. (in Russian).

Foucault M. (2011) Sécurité, Territoire, Population. Cours au Collège de France 1977–1978 (tr. by. N. V. Suslov, A. V. Shestakov, V. Yu. Bystrov). St. Petersburg: Nauka. (in Russian).

Foucault M. (2012) Du Gouvernement des vivants. Cours au Collège de France 1979–1980 (éd. par M. Senellart, F. Ewald, A. Fontana). Paris: EHESS; Gallimard; Seuil (Hautes études).

Foucault M. (2014) Subjectivité et vérité. Cours au Collège de France 1980–1981 (éd. par F. Gros, F. Ewald, A. Fontana). Paris: EHESS; Gallimard; Seuil (Hautes études).

Foucault M. (2017) Dire vrai sur soi-même. Conférences prononcées à l’Université Victoria de Toronto, 1982 (éd. par H.-P. Fruchaud, D. Lorenzini). Paris: Vrin (Philosophie du présent).

Foucault M. (2018) Histoire de la sexualité. T. 4. Les Aveux de la chair (éd. par F. Gros). Paris: Gallimard (Bibliothèque des Histoires).

Inglebert H., Destephen S., Dumézil B. (éds.) (2010) Le problème de la christianisation du monde antique. Paris: Picard (Textes, images et monuments de l’Antiquité au Haut Moyen Âge).

Laurence P. (1997) Jérôme et le nouveau modèle féminin. La conversion à la vie parfaite. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes (Collection des Études augustiniennes. Série Antiquité. Vol. 155).

Laurence P. (2012) Les droits de la femme au Bas-Empire romain. Le Code théodosien. Textes, traductions et commentaires. Paris: Chemins de tr@verse.

Lévy C. (2014) “Michel Foucault, la pensée antique et le mariage. À propos de Subjectivité et vérité. Cours au Collège de France, 1980–1981”. Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé. No. 2: 94–107.

Sfameni Gasparro G. (1984) Enkrateia e antropologia. Le motivazioni protologiche della continenza e della verginità nel cristianesimo dei primi secoli e nello gnosticismo. Roma: Institutum Patristicum “Augustinianum” (Studia ephemeridis “Augustinianum”. Vol. 20).

Sforzini A. (2014) Michel Foucault. Une pensée du corps. Paris: PUF (Philosophies).

Van Nuffelen P. (2018) Penser la tolérance durant l’Antiquité tardive. Les conférences de l’Ecole pratique des hautes études. Paris: Cerf.

© Jérôme Lagouanère, 2020  © Sergey Gashkov, transl., 2020

Daria Farafonova. “Gouvernementalité”, the mystery of government: from the analysis of the forms of rationality by Foucault to the theological genealogy of Agamben. Vol. 5. No. 1-2. 2020

Continue reading

Alexander Isakov. Two strategies of interpretation of Immanuel Kant’s practical philosophy. Review of the books: Kapustin B. G. Evil and Freedom. Reflections on Immanuel Kant’s “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason”. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2016 (Series: Political Theory). Vol. 4. No. 2. 2019

Publication Details

Two strategies of interpretation of Immanuel Kant’s practical philosophy. Review of the books: Kapustin B. G. Evil and Freedom. Reflections on Immanuel Kant’s “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason”. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2016 (Series: Political Theory).
Title in the language of publication: Две стратегии интерпретации практической философии Иммануила Канта. Рецензия на книгу: Б. Г. Капустин. Зло и свобода. Рассуждения в связи с «Религией в пределах только разума» Иммануила Канта. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2016 (Серия: Политическая теория).
Author:
Alexander Isakov
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the National Research University — Higher School of Economics, Campus in Saint Petersburg.
Address: 16 Soyuza Pechatnikov Street, St. Petersburg 190121, Russia.E-mail: alex.isakov2012@yandex.ru
Issue:
P. 318–325.
Language: Russian
Document type: Review
 
   PDF

References 

Bonhoeffer D. (1994) Widerstand und Ergebung. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian).

Gadamer H.-G. (1988) Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).

Kant I. (1965) “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten”. Kant I. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 4. Ч. 1 [Works in 6 vol. Vol. 5. Part 1]. Moscow: Mysl’ (Filosofskoe nasledie. T. 14 [Philosophical Heritage. Vol. 14]): 219–310. (in Russian).

Kant I. (1966) “Kritik der Urteilskraft”. Kant I. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 5 [Works in 6 vol. Vol. 5]. Moscow: Mysl’ (Filosofskoe nasledie. T. 16 [Philosophical Heritage. Vol. 16]): 161–527. (in Russian).

Kant I. (1966) “Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft”. Kant I. Traktaty i pis’ma [Treatises and letters]. Moscow: Nauka (Pamyatniki filosofskoi mysli [Monuments of philosophical thought]): 78–278. (in Russian).

Kapustin B. G. (2004) Moral’nyj vybor v politike. Uchebnoe posobie [Moral choice in politics. Study guide].Moscow: Knizhnyj dom “Universitet”; Izd. MSU (Politicheskij razum i praktika politiki [Political reason and practice of politics]). (in Russian).

Kapustin B. G. (2008) “Kritika kantovskoj kritiki ‘Prava lgat’’ kak vyyavlenie granic moral’noj filosofii]” [Criticism of Kantian criticism of the ‘Right to lie’ as detection of the limits of moral philosophy. Logos. Filosofsko-literaturnyi zhurnal. № 5 (68) [Logos. A philosophical and literary journal. No. 5 (68)]: 122–143. (in Russian).

Kapustin B. G. (2016) Zlo i svoboda. Rassuzhdeniya v svyazi s “Religiej v predelah tol’ko razuma” Immanuila Kanta [Evil and Freedom. Reflections on Immanuel Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason]. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki (Politicheskaya teoriya [Political Theory]). (in Russian).

Peirce C. S. (2000) “How to Make Our Ideas Clear”. Peirce C. S. Nachala pragmatizma [Basics of pragmatism]. St. Petersburg: Laboratoriya metafizicheskih issledovanij filosofskogo fakul’teta SPbU; Aletheia (Metafizicheskie issledovaniya. Prilozhenie k al’manahu [Metaphysical researches. Appendix to almanac]): 125–154. (in Russian).

Scheler M. (1994) “Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik”. Scheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Moscow: Gnozis (Fenomenologiya. Germenevtika. Filosofiya yazyka [Phenomenology. Hermeneutics. Philosophy of language]): 259–337. (in Russian).

.© Alexander Isakov, 2019

Ivan Protopopov. To be or not to be? Yet another philosophy of non-being. Review of the books: Kritchevsky A. V. The Power of the Nonbeing: A Metaphysics Beyond of Ontology. Moscow; Berlin: Direckt-Media, 2015. Vol. 4. No. 2. 2019

Publication Details

To be or not to be? Yet another philosophy of non-being. Review of the books: Kritchevsky A. V. The Power of the Nonbeing: A Metaphysics Beyond of Ontology. Moscow; Berlin: Direckt-Media, 2015. 
Title in the language of publication: Быть или не быть? Очередная философия небытия. Рецензия на книгу: А. В. Кричевский. Сила небытия: метафизика за пределами онтологии. М. – Берлин: Директ-Медиа, 2015.
Author:
Ivan Protopopov
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Faculty of Humanities of the Saint Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation.
Address: 67A Bolshaya Morskaia str., St. Petersburg, 190000, Russia.
Issue:
P. 309–317.
Language: Russian
Document type: Review
 
   PDF

References 

Chanyshev A. N. (1990) “Traktata o nebytii” [Treatise on Non-being]. Voprosy filosofii. № 10 [Questions in Philosophy. No. 10]: 158–165. (in Russian).

Hegel G. W. F. (1986a) “Wissenschaft der Logik I. Erster Teil. Die objektive Logik. Erstes Buch”. Hegel G. W. F. Werke in 20 Bänden mit Registerband. Auf der Grundlage der Werke von 1832–1845 neu edierte Ausgabe (Theorie-Werkausgabe). Hrsg. von E. Moldenhauer und K. M. Michel. Bd 5. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Hegel G. W. F. (1986b) “Wissenschaft der Logik II. Erster Teil. Die objektive Logik. Zweites Buch. Zweiter Teil. Die subjektive Logik”. Hegel G. W. F. Werke in 20 Bänden mit Registerband. Auf der Grundlage der Werke von 1832–1845 neu edierte Ausgabe (Theorie-Werkausgabe). Hrsg. von E. Moldenhauer und K. M. Michel. Bd 6. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Hegel G. W. F. (1986c) “Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse 1830. Erster Teil. Die Wissenschaft der Logik. Mit den mündlichen Zusätzen”. Hegel G. W. F. Werke in 20 Bänden mit Registerband. Auf der Grundlage der Werke von 1832–1845 neu edierte Ausgabe (Theorie-Werkausgabe). Hrsg. von E. Moldenhauer und K. M. Michel. Bd 8. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Hegel G. W. F. (2000) Phänomenologie des Geistes. Moscow: Nauka (Pamyatniki filosofskoi mysli [Monuments of philosophical thought]). (in Russian).

Kritchevsky A. V. (2009) Obraz absolyuta v filosofii Hegelya i pozdnego Shellinga [The Image of the Absolute in Hegel’s Philosophy and Philosophy of Late Schelling]. Moscow: IP RAS. (in Russian).

Kritchevsky A. V. (2011) Absolyutnyj duh skvoz’liki triedinstva. Sravnitel’nyj analiz filosofsko-teologicheskih koncepcij Hegelya i pozdnego Shellinga [The Absolute Spirit through the Forms of the Trinity. A Comparative Analysis of the Philosophical-Theological Teachings of Hegel and of Late Schelling]. Moscow: IP RAS. (in Russian).

Kritchevsky A. V. (2015) Sila nebytiya: metafizika za predelami ontologii [The Power of the Nonbeing: A Metaphysics Beyond of Ontology]. Moscow; Berlin: Direckt-Media. (in Russian).

Schelling F. W. J. (1999) System der Weltalter. Münchener Vorlesung 1827/28 in einer Nachschrift von Ersnt von Lasaul (hg., eingel. v. S. Peetz). Tomsk: Vodoley. (In Russian).

.

© Ivan Protopopov, 2019

Maria Varlamova. Foreword to translation of Michael Psellos’ commentary on chapters 1–3 of the book III and chapter 10 of the book VIII of Aristotle’s “Physics”. Vol. 4. No. 2. 2019

Continue reading