Alexander Isakov. Two strategies of interpretation of Immanuel Kant’s practical philosophy. Review of the books: Kapustin B. G. Evil and Freedom. Reflections on Immanuel Kant’s “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason”. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2016 (Series: Political Theory). Vol. 4. No. 2. 2019

Publication Details

Two strategies of interpretation of Immanuel Kant’s practical philosophy. Review of the books: Kapustin B. G. Evil and Freedom. Reflections on Immanuel Kant’s “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason”. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2016 (Series: Political Theory).
Title in the language of publication: Две стратегии интерпретации практической философии Иммануила Канта. Рецензия на книгу: Б. Г. Капустин. Зло и свобода. Рассуждения в связи с «Религией в пределах только разума» Иммануила Канта. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2016 (Серия: Политическая теория).
Author:
Alexander Isakov
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the National Research University — Higher School of Economics, Campus in Saint Petersburg.
Address: 16 Soyuza Pechatnikov Street, St. Petersburg 190121, Russia.E-mail: alex.isakov2012@yandex.ru
Issue:
P. 318–325.
Language: Russian
Document type: Review
 
   PDF

References 

Bonhoeffer D. (1994) Widerstand und Ergebung. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian).

Gadamer H.-G. (1988) Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).

Kant I. (1965) “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten”. Kant I. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 4. Ч. 1 [Works in 6 vol. Vol. 5. Part 1]. Moscow: Mysl’ (Filosofskoe nasledie. T. 14 [Philosophical Heritage. Vol. 14]): 219–310. (in Russian).

Kant I. (1966) “Kritik der Urteilskraft”. Kant I. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 5 [Works in 6 vol. Vol. 5]. Moscow: Mysl’ (Filosofskoe nasledie. T. 16 [Philosophical Heritage. Vol. 16]): 161–527. (in Russian).

Kant I. (1966) “Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft”. Kant I. Traktaty i pis’ma [Treatises and letters]. Moscow: Nauka (Pamyatniki filosofskoi mysli [Monuments of philosophical thought]): 78–278. (in Russian).

Kapustin B. G. (2004) Moral’nyj vybor v politike. Uchebnoe posobie [Moral choice in politics. Study guide].Moscow: Knizhnyj dom “Universitet”; Izd. MSU (Politicheskij razum i praktika politiki [Political reason and practice of politics]). (in Russian).

Kapustin B. G. (2008) “Kritika kantovskoj kritiki ‘Prava lgat’’ kak vyyavlenie granic moral’noj filosofii]” [Criticism of Kantian criticism of the ‘Right to lie’ as detection of the limits of moral philosophy. Logos. Filosofsko-literaturnyi zhurnal. № 5 (68) [Logos. A philosophical and literary journal. No. 5 (68)]: 122–143. (in Russian).

Kapustin B. G. (2016) Zlo i svoboda. Rassuzhdeniya v svyazi s “Religiej v predelah tol’ko razuma” Immanuila Kanta [Evil and Freedom. Reflections on Immanuel Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason]. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki (Politicheskaya teoriya [Political Theory]). (in Russian).

Peirce C. S. (2000) “How to Make Our Ideas Clear”. Peirce C. S. Nachala pragmatizma [Basics of pragmatism]. St. Petersburg: Laboratoriya metafizicheskih issledovanij filosofskogo fakul’teta SPbU; Aletheia (Metafizicheskie issledovaniya. Prilozhenie k al’manahu [Metaphysical researches. Appendix to almanac]): 125–154. (in Russian).

Scheler M. (1994) “Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik”. Scheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Moscow: Gnozis (Fenomenologiya. Germenevtika. Filosofiya yazyka [Phenomenology. Hermeneutics. Philosophy of language]): 259–337. (in Russian).

.© Alexander Isakov, 2019

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.