Publication Details
| Messianism: an Essay of Non-Appropriative Reading. Review of the book: Agamben G. Il tempo che resta. Un commento alla “Lettera ai romani”. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 2000 (Saggi. Storia, filosofia e scienze sociali) (Russian translation by Sergey Ermakov: Agamben G. Il tempo che resta. Un commento alla “Lettera ai romani”. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2018 (Intellectual History)). | |
| Title in the language of publication: | Мессианизм: опыт неприсваивающего чтения. Рецензия на книгу: Агамбен Д. Оставшееся время: Комментарий к Посланию к Римлянам. Пер. с итал. С. Ермакова. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2018 (Серия: Интеллектуальная история). / Agamben G. Il tempo che resta. Un commento alla «Lettera ai romani». Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 2000 (Saggi. Storia, filosofia e scienze sociali). |
| Authors: |
Sergey Ermakov
Associate Research Fellow at the Sociological institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Address: 25/14 7-ya Krasnoarmeyskaya str., St. Petersburg 190005, Russia.
E-mail: yermakovsa@gmail.com
|
| Issue: |
P. 533–542.
|
| Language: | Russian |
| Document type: | Review |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.31119/essephts.2019.4.1.16 |
References
Agamben G. (2018) Il tempo che resta. Un commento alla “Lettera ai romani”. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (Intellektual’naya istoriya [Intellectual History]). (in Russian).
Badiou A. (1999) Saint Paul. La fondation de l’universalisme. Moscow: Moskovskii filosofskii fond; St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga (Biblioteka sovremennoi frantsuzskoi filosofii [The library of contemporary French philosophy]). (in Russian).
Benjamin W. (2012) “Über den Begriff der Geschichte”. Benjamin W. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniya [Doctrine of Similarity. Mediaaesthetic Works] (ed. by I Chubarov, I Boldyrev). Moscow: Izd-vo RGGU (Sovremennye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Kn. I [Present day humanistic studies. Vol. I]): 237–253. (in Russian).
Chantraine P. (1970) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. Tome II: Ε–Κ. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.
Ermakov S. (2017a) “Biokhronopolitika: Lenin glazami Agambena [Biochronopolitics: Lenin in Agamben’s perspective]”. Sinii divan. Filosofsko-teoreticheskii zhurnal. Vyp. 22 [Blue couch. Philosophical-theoretical magazine]: 46–66. (in Russian).
Ermakov S. (2017b) “Fil’my i konets: apokalipticheskoe i messianicheskoe v kino [The Films and The End: The Apocalyptical and The Messianical in Cinema]” (Opublikovano: 11 dekabrya 2017 g. [Published December 11, 2017]). Cineticle. Internet-zhurnal ob avtorskom kino. № 23. K novoi geografii kino [Cineticle. A digital magazine dedicated to independent cinema. No. 23. On new geography of cinema]. Retrieved from http://cineticle.com/magazine/1591-23-0-films-and-end.html (in Russian).
Heidegger M. (2002) Sein und Zeit. St. Petersburg: Nauka (Slovo o sushchem [Word on the Being]). (in Russian).
Schmitt C. (2008) Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal (Civitas Terrena). (in Russian).
Taubes J. (1993) Politische Theologie des Paulus. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Tiedemann R. (1989) “Historical Materialism or Political Messianism? An Interpretation of the Theses ‘On the Concept of History’”. Walter Benjamin: Philosophy, Aesthetics, History (ed. by G. Smith). Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press: 175–209.
Voegelin E. (1987) The New Science of Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
© Sergey Ermakov, 2019
