Nikita Zagvozdkin. The Substantivity of History: Walter Benjamin amid cardboard kings, old books, and metallic constructions. Vol. 4. No. 1. 2019

Publication Details

The Substantivity of History: Walter Benjamin amid cardboard kings, old books, and metallic constructions
Title in the language of publication: Вещественность истории: Вальтер Беньямин среди картонных королей, старых книг и металлических конструкций
Author:
Nikita Zagvozdkin
Master’s Student, University of Wuppertal.
Address: Gaußstraße 20, 42119, Wuppertal, Germany.
Issue:
P. 43–72.
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.31119/essephts.2019.4.1.2
 

Abstract

The article discusses the range of images and simultaneously thought figures that Walter Benjamin continuously used during various periods of his work to constitute and conceive the relation between things and history. For this purpose, the following points of attraction of his thought and imagination are empathized in the variety of insights, suggestions, and interconnections, which form the field of Benjamin’s philosophy: props of the Baroque theater, collections of old books, and metallic constructions shaping the landscape of early capitalistic industry. Each one of these groups is considered to express a certain mode of reification of history, which introduces it into the boundaries of human practice, giving thereby one a promise of salvation in the problematic situation of epoch. The allegorical condensation of time within the stage props makes it dramatically amendable; the inclusion of objects into the context of involuntary memory (Proust) gives one a chance to reclaim past experiences in a meaningful integrity of impression; the outdated symbols of class domination of bourgeoisie wake the revolutionary subject from its ideological dream and constellate the image of future utopia. In all three cases, the reality of the transformation of history into an object and its messianic potential are identified as general framework of Benjamin’s account on the subject. Yet, each synthesis of time and substantiality imposes its own perspective: dramatically aesthetical, mnemonically transcendental, and socially political. Accordingly, the analyzed texts differ thematically and in terms of methodic prerequisites of their organization, as well as in terms of the cited personalities. At the end of the article, this complex of discrepancies is traced back to the language of Benjamin’s writing since the philosopher tends to simultaneously separate and conjoin elements of his thinking, treating the emerging whole as an elaborate intellectual mosaic. Therefore, the structure and form of the article are grasped as a methodological reflection of the examined subject matter.

Keywords

Benjamin, history, things, reification, German tragic drama, collecting, ruins of bourgeoisie, commodity fetishism, photography, fragment.

References 

Adorno T. (2003) Negative Dialektik. Moscow: Nauchnyi mir. (in Russian).

Adorno T., Horkheimer M. (1997) Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Medium; Yuventa. (in Russian).

Agamben G. (2007) “Stanze. La parola e il fantasma nella cultura occidentale”. Vita Cogitans. No. 5: 295–332. (in Russian).

Arendt H. (2003) “Walter Benjamin (1892–1940)”. Arendt H. Menschen in finsteren Zeiten. Moscow: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskih issledovanij (Kul’tura, politika, filosofiya [Culture, Politics, Philosophy]): 175–237. (in Russian).

Bekmemetev V. (2016) “‘Musor istorii’: spasenie veshchej kak aktualizaciya proshlogo” [“The trash of history”: do things find their redemption?]. Kul’turnaya pamyat’ i kul’turnaya identichnost’: materialy Vserossijskoj (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchnoj konferencii molodyh uchenyh (XI Kolosnicynskie chteniya) [Cultural Memory and Cultural Identity: Materials of All-Russia academic conference of young scientists with international participation (XI Kolosnitsyn readings)]. Yekaterinburg: Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta: 27–31. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (1991a) “Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels”. Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. I–VII. Bd. I. Teil. 1 (hg. v. R. Tiedemann und H. Schweppenhäuser). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag: 203–431.

Benjamin W. (1991b) “Über einige Motive bei Baudelaire”. Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. I–VII. Bd. I. Teil. 2 (hg. v. R. Tiedemann und H. Schweppenhäuser). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag: 605–655.

Benjamin W. (1991c) “Über den Begriff der Geschichte” (mit Anmerkungen der Herausgeber). Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. I–VII. Bd. I. Teil. 2–3 (hg. v. R. Tiedemann und H. Schweppenhäuser). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag: 691–706, 1223–1272.

Benjamin W. (1991d) “Der Surrealismus. Die letzte Momentaufnahme der europäischen Intelligenz”. Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. I–VII. Bd. II. Teil. 1 (hg. v. R. Tiedemann und H. Schweppenhäuser). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag: 295–310.

Benjamin W. (1991e) “Ausgraben und Erinnern”. Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. I–VII. Bd. IV. Teil. 1 (hg. v. Rexroth). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag: 400–401.

Benjamin W. (1991f) “Das Passagen-Werk”. Benjamin W. Gesammelte Schriften. Bd. I–VII. Bd. V. Teil. 1–2 (hg. v. R. Tiedemann). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Benjamin W. (2000) “Paris, Capitale du XIXème siècle”. Benjamin W. Illuminationen. Ausgewählte Schriften. Moscow: Martis: 153–167. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2002) Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels. Moscow: Agraf. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2004a) “Zum Bilde Prousts”. Benjamin W. Maski vremeni. Esse o kul’ture i literature [Masks of Time. Essays on Culture and Literature] (coll., intr., notes by A. Belobratov). St. Petersburg: Simpozium: 243–262. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2004b) “Der Surrealismus. Die letzte Momentaufnahme der europäischen Intelligenz”. Benjamin W. Maski vremeni. Esse o kul’ture i literature [Masks of Time. Essays on Culture and Literature] (coll., intr., notes by A. Belobratov). St. Petersburg: Simpozium: 263–282. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2004c) “Theorien des deutschen Faschismus. Zu der Sammelschrift ‘Krieg und Krieger’. Herausgegeben von Ernst Jünger”. Benjamin W. Maski vremeni. Esse o kul’ture i literature [Masks of Time. Essays on Culture and Literature] (coll., intr., notes by A. Belobratov). St. Petersburg: Simpozium: 359–375. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2004d) “Linke Melancholie. Zu Erich Kästners neuem Gedichtbuch”. Benjamin W. Maski vremeni. Esse o kul’ture i literature [Masks of Time. Essays on Culture and Literature] (coll., intr., notes by A. Belobratov). St. Petersburg: Simpozium: 376–382. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2004e) “Ich packe meine Bibliothek aus. Eine Rede über das Sammeln”. Benjamin W. Maski vremeni. Esse o kul’ture i literature [Masks of Time. Essays on Culture and Literature] (coll., intr., notes by A. Belobratov). St. Petersburg: Simpozium: 433–444. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2012a) Berliner Kindheit um Neunzehnhundert. Moscow: Ad Marginem; Yekaterinburg: Kabinetnyj uchenyj (Biblioteka zhurnala “Logos” [library of the “Logos” magazine]). (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2012b) “Über das Programm der kommenden Philosophie”. Benjamin W. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniya [Doctrine of Similarity. Mediaaesthetic Works] (ed. by I. Chubarov, I. Boldyrev). Moscow: Izd-vo RGGU (Sovremennye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Kn. I [Present day humanistic studies. Vol. I]): 31–51. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2012c) “Kapitalismus als Religion”. Benjamin W. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniya [Doctrine of Similarity. Mediaaesthetic Works] (ed. by I. Chubarov, I. Boldyrev). Moscow: Izd-vo RGGU (Sovremennye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Kn. I [Present day humanistic studies. Vol. I]): 100–108. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2012d) “Kleine Geschichte der Fotografie”. Benjamin W. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniya [Doctrine of Similarity. Mediaaesthetic Works] (ed. by I. Chubarov, I. Boldyrev). Moscow: Izd-vo RGGU (Sovremennye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Kn. I [Present day humanistic studies. Vol. I]): 109–132. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2012e) “Der Autor als Produzent. Ansprache im Institut zum Studium des Fascismus in Paris am 27. April 1934”. Benjamin W. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniya [Doctrine of Similarity. Mediaaesthetic Works] (ed. by I. Chubarov, I. Boldyrev). Moscow: Izd-vo RGGU (Sovremennye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Kn. I [Present day humanistic studies. Vol. I]): 133–163. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2012f) “Lehre vom Ähnlichen”. Benjamin W. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniya [Doctrine of Similarity. Mediaaesthetic Works] (ed. by I. Chubarov, I. Boldyrev). Moscow: Izd-vo RGGU (Sovremennye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Kn. I [Present day humanistic studies. Vol. I]): 164–187. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2012g) “Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit”. Benjamin W. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniya [Doctrine of Similarity. Mediaaesthetic Works] (ed. by I. Chubarov, I. Boldyrev). Moscow: Izd-vo RGGU (Sovremennye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Kn. I [Present day humanistic studies. Vol. I]): 190–234. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2012h) “Über den Begriff der Geschichte”. Benjamin W. Uchenie o podobii. Mediaesteticheskie proizvedeniya [Doctrine of Similarity. Mediaaesthetic Works] (ed. by I. Chubarov, I. Boldyrev). Moscow: Izd-vo RGGU (Sovremennye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Kn. I [Present day humanistic studies. Vol. I]): 237–253. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2013) “Franz Kafka”. Benjamin W. Frantz Kafka. Moscow: Ad Marginem: 7–47. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2015а) “Charles Baudelaire. Ein Lyriker im Zeitalter des Hochkapitalismus”. Benjamin W. Baudelaire. Moscow: Ad Marginem: 7–116. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2015b) “Über einige Motive bei Baudelaire”. Benjamin W. Baudelaire. Moscow: Ad Marginem: 117–186. (in Russian).

Benjamin W. (2015c) “Zentralpark”. Benjamin W. Baudelaire. Moscow: Ad Marginem: 187–220. (in Russian).

Boldyrev I. (2012) Vremya utopii. Problematicheskie osnovaniya i konteksty filosofii Ernsta Blocha [Time of Utopia. Problematic Foundations and Contexts of the Ernst Bloch’s Philosophy]. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. (in Russian).

Chubarov I. (2012) “Benjamin Schmittu ne tovarishch, ili Oshibka Agambena» [Benjamin is no comrade to Schmitt, or Agamben’s Mistake]. Logos. Filosofsko-literaturnyi zhurnal. № 5 (68) [Logos. A philosophical and literary journal. No. 5 (89)]: 44–67. (in Russian).

Eagleton T. (2009) Marxism and Literary Criticism. Moscow: Svobodnoe marksistskoe izdatel’stvo. (in Russian).

Eder B. (2014) “TräumerInnen im Wachen”. (K)ein Ende der Kunst. Kritische Theorie, Ästhetik, Gesellschaft (hg. v. B. Marschall, C. Schulte, S. Vorwalder, F. Wagner). Münster: LIT Verlag: 121–138.

Emden C. (2003) “‘Nachleben’: Cultural Memory in Aby Warburg and Walter Benjamin”. Cultural Memory: Essays on European Literature and History (ed. by E. Caldicott, A. Fuchs). Bern: Peter Lang: 209–224.

Engels F. (1961) “Die Entwicklung des Sozialismus von der Utopie zur Wissenschaft”. Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya. 2-e izd. V 50 t. T. 19 [Works. 2 ed. In 50 vol. Vol. 19]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury: 185–230. (in Russian).

Habermas J. (2003) Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Zwölf Vorlesungen. Moscow: Ves’ mir (Tema). (in Russian).

Jameson F. (2014) “Walter Benjamin, or Nostalgia”. Jameson F. Marksizm i interpretatsiya kul’tury [Marxism and Interpretation of Culture] (coll. by A. A. Paramonov). Moscow; Yekaterinburg: Kabinetnyj uchenyj: 116–136. (in Russian).

Jeffries S. (2018) Grand Hotel “Abyss”: The Lives of the Frankfurt School. Moscow: Ad Marginem. (in Russian).

Levashov V. (2015) “Chitat’ i razgadyvat’: Walter Benjamin o fotografii” [Reading and Solving: Walter Benjamin on Photography]. Benjamin W. Kratkaya istoriya fotografii [Short History of Photography]. Moscow: Ad Marginem. (in Russian).

Lukács G. (2003) Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein. Studien über marxistische Dialektik. Moscow: Logos-Al’tera (Levaya karta [Leftist card]). (in Russian).

Marx K. (2015) Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Oekonomie. Erster Band. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber. (in Russian).

Pogrebnyak A. (2018) “Morshchiny i igrushki Walter Benjamina: ‘Moskovskii dnevnik’ kak ispytanie metoda” [The Wrinkles and Toys of Walter Benjamin: “The Moscow Diary” as a Method Appraisal]. Logos. Filosofsko-literaturnyi zhurnal. № 1 (122) [Logos. A philosophical and literary journal. No. 1 (122)]: 59–86. (in Russian).

Romashko S. (2002) “Dramatika literatury i dramatika zhizni” [Dramatics of Literature and Dramatics of Life]. Benjamin W. Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels. Moscow: Agraf: 271–281. (in Russian).

Steiner U. (2004) Walter Benjamin. Stuttgart; Weimar: Verlag J. B. Metzler (Sammlung Metzler. Bd. 350).

Taganov A. (2015) “Benjamin i Proust” [Benjamin and Proust]. Charles Baudelaire & Walter Benjamin. Politika & Estetika. Kollektivnaya monografiya po materialam mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo simpoziuma, sostoyavshegosya 20–21 aprelya 2008 goda v Institute russkoj literatury RAN (Pushkinskij Dom) v oznamenovanie 150-letiya vyhoda v svet “Cvetov zla” [Charles Baudelaire & Walter Benjamin. Politics & Aesthetics. Collctive monograph on materials of the international scientific symposium held on April 20–21, 2008, in the Institute of Russian Literature of the Russian Academy of Science (Pushkin House) in commemoration of 150th anniversary of first publication of “The Flowers of Evil”]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (Nauchnaya biblioteka [Scientific library]). (in Russian).

Travnikov S. K. (2015) “Rol’ neproizvol’noi pamyati v dialektike sna i probuzhdeniya Walter Benjamina (Proekt ‘Passazhi’)” [A Conceptual Role of “La Mémoire Involontaire” in Walter Benjamin’s Dialectics of Dream and Awakening (“Arcades” Project)]. Artikult. № 3 (19) [Art & Cult. No. 3 (19)]: 29–34. (in Russian).

Zagvozdkin N. (2018) “K istorii odnoi zagadki: ponyatie tovarnogo fetishizma v filosofii Marksa” [History of One Riddle: The Concept of Commodity Fetishism in the Philosophy of Marx]. Filosofiya marksizma. Istoriya i sovremennost’. K 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Karla Marksa [Philosophy of Marxism. History and the Present. To 200th anniversary of Karl Marx]. St. Petersburg: Politekh-Press: 243–263. (in Russian).

© Nikita Zagvozdkin, 2019

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.