Alexander Isakov. Two strategies of interpretation of Immanuel Kant’s practical philosophy. Review of the books: Kapustin B. G. Evil and Freedom. Reflections on Immanuel Kant’s “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason”. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2016 (Series: Political Theory). Vol. 4. No. 2. 2019

Publication Details

Two strategies of interpretation of Immanuel Kant’s practical philosophy. Review of the books: Kapustin B. G. Evil and Freedom. Reflections on Immanuel Kant’s “Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason”. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2016 (Series: Political Theory).
Title in the language of publication: Две стратегии интерпретации практической философии Иммануила Канта. Рецензия на книгу: Б. Г. Капустин. Зло и свобода. Рассуждения в связи с «Религией в пределах только разума» Иммануила Канта. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2016 (Серия: Политическая теория).
Author:
Alexander Isakov
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the National Research University — Higher School of Economics, Campus in Saint Petersburg.
Address: 16 Soyuza Pechatnikov Street, St. Petersburg 190121, Russia.E-mail: alex.isakov2012@yandex.ru
Issue:
P. 318–325.
Language: Russian
Document type: Review
 
   PDF

References 

Bonhoeffer D. (1994) Widerstand und Ergebung. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian).

Gadamer H.-G. (1988) Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).

Kant I. (1965) “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten”. Kant I. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 4. Ч. 1 [Works in 6 vol. Vol. 5. Part 1]. Moscow: Mysl’ (Filosofskoe nasledie. T. 14 [Philosophical Heritage. Vol. 14]): 219–310. (in Russian).

Kant I. (1966) “Kritik der Urteilskraft”. Kant I. Soch.: v 6 t. T. 5 [Works in 6 vol. Vol. 5]. Moscow: Mysl’ (Filosofskoe nasledie. T. 16 [Philosophical Heritage. Vol. 16]): 161–527. (in Russian).

Kant I. (1966) “Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft”. Kant I. Traktaty i pis’ma [Treatises and letters]. Moscow: Nauka (Pamyatniki filosofskoi mysli [Monuments of philosophical thought]): 78–278. (in Russian).

Kapustin B. G. (2004) Moral’nyj vybor v politike. Uchebnoe posobie [Moral choice in politics. Study guide].Moscow: Knizhnyj dom “Universitet”; Izd. MSU (Politicheskij razum i praktika politiki [Political reason and practice of politics]). (in Russian).

Kapustin B. G. (2008) “Kritika kantovskoj kritiki ‘Prava lgat’’ kak vyyavlenie granic moral’noj filosofii]” [Criticism of Kantian criticism of the ‘Right to lie’ as detection of the limits of moral philosophy. Logos. Filosofsko-literaturnyi zhurnal. № 5 (68) [Logos. A philosophical and literary journal. No. 5 (68)]: 122–143. (in Russian).

Kapustin B. G. (2016) Zlo i svoboda. Rassuzhdeniya v svyazi s “Religiej v predelah tol’ko razuma” Immanuila Kanta [Evil and Freedom. Reflections on Immanuel Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason]. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki (Politicheskaya teoriya [Political Theory]). (in Russian).

Peirce C. S. (2000) “How to Make Our Ideas Clear”. Peirce C. S. Nachala pragmatizma [Basics of pragmatism]. St. Petersburg: Laboratoriya metafizicheskih issledovanij filosofskogo fakul’teta SPbU; Aletheia (Metafizicheskie issledovaniya. Prilozhenie k al’manahu [Metaphysical researches. Appendix to almanac]): 125–154. (in Russian).

Scheler M. (1994) “Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik”. Scheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Moscow: Gnozis (Fenomenologiya. Germenevtika. Filosofiya yazyka [Phenomenology. Hermeneutics. Philosophy of language]): 259–337. (in Russian).

.© Alexander Isakov, 2019

Alexander Isakov. An essay of refutation of one metaphysical provocation. Review of the book: Gryakalov N. A. The Human Lots. An Essay of Total Anthropology. St. Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin, 2015. Vol. 1. No. 1. 2016

Publication Details

An essay of refutation of one metaphysical provocation. Review of the book: Gryakalov N. A. The Human Lots. An Essay of Total Anthropology. St. Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin, 2015. 
Title in the language of publication: Опыт преодоления одной метафизической провокации.  Рецензия на книгу: Н. А. Грякалов. Жребии человеческого. Очерк тотальной антропологии. СПб.: Дмитрий Буланин, 2015.
Author:
Alexander Isakov
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Institute of Philosophy of the Saint Petersburg State University.
Address: 7/9 Universitetskaya emb., St. Petersburg 199034, Russia.
Issue:
P. 381–385.
Language: Russian
Document type: Review
 
   PDF

References 

Derrida J. (1996) “L’origine de la géométrie, de Husserl. Introduction”. Husserl Ed. Nachalo geometrii. Vvedenie J. Derrida [Husserl Ed. The Origin of Geometry. Introduction by J. Derrida] (tr., comment. by M. Mayatsky). Moscow: Ad Marginem: 8–209. (in Russian).

Derrida J. (1999) Golos i fenomen, i drugie raboty po teorii znaka Gusserlya [Speech and Phenomena, and other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs] (tr. by S. G. Kashin, N. V. Suslov). St. Petersburg: Aleteiya. (in Russian).

Gryakalov N. A. (2015) Zhrebii chelovecheskogo. Ocherk total’noi antropologii [The Human Lots. An Essay of Total Anthropology]. St. Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin. (in Russian).

Husserl Ed. (1996) “Die Frage nach dem Ursprung der Geometrie als intentional-historisches Problem”. Husserl Ed. Nachalo geometrii. Vvedenie J. Derrida [Husserl Ed. The Origin of Geometry. Introduction by J. Derrida] (tr., comment. by M. Mayatsky). Moscow: Ad Marginem: 210–245. (in Russian). 

.© Alexander Isakov, 2016