Anatoly Akhutin. The “Homonymy” in Translation of Philosophical Terms. Vol. 3. No. 1. 2018

Publication Details

The “Homonymy” in Translation of Philosophical Terms
Title in the language of publication: «Омонимия» в переводе философских понятий
Author:
Anatoly Akhutin
PhD in Chemistry, Associate Research Fellow of the European Humanities Research Center at the National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy”.
Address: 2 Skovorody vul., Kyiv 04070, Ukraine.
Issue:
P. 5–14.
Language: Russian
Document type: Research Article
 
   PDF

Abstract

Translation of philosophical terms encounters specific difficulties. The philosophical concept, on the one hand, is deeply connected with semantics of the language in which it was developed. On the other hand, a subject, which it concerns (“world”, “nature”, “consciousness”, “concept” itself…), arises — a as if for the first time — in a unique logic of speculation and is defined by it. For the philosophical systems, therefore, there could be no general extra-philosophical thesaurus that could be used for translation. For example, if the Greek words “idea” or “kosmos” are used today for translation of the corresponding terms of Greek philosophy, a literal homonymy occurs. Moreover, even in the cases where the name is translatable, a kind of homonymy occurs on another level: the name will be translated, but it will signify another concept, that is, another λόγος τῆς οὐσίας, in the wording of Aristotle’s definition of homonymy: another definition of the very nature of the object of definition. Such a homonymy could be illustrated, in particular, with the translations of the words constituting this phrase itself: λόγος could be rendered as ratio, ground, statement, whereas οὐσία as substantia, essence. Translation of the philosophical terms requires not only philological but also properly philosophical competence.

Keywords

Philosophy, philology, translation, homonymy, concept, semantic, “logos”, logic, “kosmos” (space).

References 

Aristotle (1908) “Metaphysics” (tr. by W. D. Ross). The Works of Aristotle. In 12 vol. Vol. 8. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Aristotle (1960) “Posterior Analytics” (ed., tr. by H. Tredennick). Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. Topica (ed., tr. by H. Tredennick, E. S. Foster). London: William Heinemann; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library. No. 391): 1–263.

Aristotle (1962) “Categories” (ed., tr. by H. P. Cook). Aristotle. Categories. On Interpretation. Prior Analytics (ed., tr. by H. P. Cook, H. Tredennick). London: William Heinemann; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library. No. 325): 1–109.

Aristotle (1975) The Metaphysics. Books I–IX (ed., tr. by H. Tredennick). London: William Heinemann; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library. No. 271).

Aristoteles (1934) Metaphysica (tr. by A. V. Kubitsky). Moscow; Leningrad: Sotsekgiz. (in Russian).

Aristoteles (1976) “Metaphysica”. (tr. by A. V. Kubitsky, M. I. Itkin). Aristoteles. Soch.: v 4 t. T. 1 [Works in 4 vol. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Mysl’ (Filosofskoe nasledie. T. 65 [Philosophical Heritage. Vol. 65]): 63–367. (in Russian).

Burckert W. (1962) Weisheit und Wissenschaft. Studien zu Pythagoras, Philolaos und Platon. Nuremberg: Hans Carl.

Cassin B. (éd.) (2004) Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: dictionnaire des intraduisibles. Paris: Le Seuil; Le Robert.

Epicurus (1887) “Epicuri quae fertur ad Pythoclem. Epistula secunda. De meteoris”. EPICUREA (ed. H. Usener). Lipsiae: In aedibus B. G. Teubneri: 33–55.

Homerus (1990) Ilias (tr. by N. I. Gnedich). Leningrad: Nauka (Literaturnye pamyatniki [Literary monuments]). (in Russian).

Joël K. (1906) Ursprung der Naturphilosophie aus dem Geiste der Mystik. Mit Anhang Archaische Romantik. Jena: Verlag Eugen Diederichs.

Lebedev A. V. (coll.) (1989) Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov. Ch. 1. Ot epicheskikh teokosmogonii do vozniknoveniya atomistiki [Fragments of Early Greek Philosophers. Part 1. From the Epical Theo-cosmogonies to the Appearance of the Atomism] (coll., tr. by A. V. Lebedev; ed., intr. by I. D. Rozhansky). Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).

Liddell H. G., Scott R. (1883) A Greek-English Lexicon. New York: Harper & brothers.

Orlov E. V. (2011) Filosofskii yazyk Aristotelya [The Philosophical Language of Aristotle]. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo sibirskogo otdeleniya RAN. (in Russian).

Plato (1901) “Philebus”. Platonis opera (recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit I. Burnet). Tomus II. Tetralogias III–IV Continens. Oxford: Clarendon Press (Scriptorum Classicorum Bibliotheca Oxoniensis).

Plutarchus (1961) Vitae Parallelae. V trekh tomakh. T. 1 [In 3 vol. Vol. 1] (tr. by S. P. Markish, S. I. Sobolevsky). Moscow: Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR (Literaturnye pamyatniki [Literary monuments]). (in Russian).

Schelling F. W. J. (1998) Ideen zu einer Philosophie der Natur. Als Einleitung in das Studium dieser Wissenschaft (tr., intr. by A. L. Pestov). St. Petersburg: Nauka (Slovo o sushchem [Word on the Being]). (in Russian).

Vocabulaire européen des philosophies (2015) Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: dictionnaire des intraduisibles (ed. by B. Cassin). T. 1 [Vol. 1]. Kiev: Dukh i Litera. (in Russian).

Vocabulaire européen des philosophies (2009–2016) Vocabulaire européen des philosophies: dictionnaire des intraduisibles (ed. by B. Cassin). Kiev: Dukh i Litera (T. 1, 2009; T. 2, 2011; T. 3, 2013; T. 4, 2016 [Vol. 1, 2009; Vol. 2, 2011; Vol. 3, 2013; Vol. 4, 2016]). (in Ukrainian).

Zeldovich Ya. B., Novikov I. D. (1975) Stroenie i evolyutsiya Vselennoi [The Structure and the Evolution of the Universe]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).

© Anatoly Akhutin, 2018

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.